The GMO-Free Revolution has Reached the U.S.

Of course, the mainstream media has nothing to stay about it, but The Oregonian at least disdained to report on it on their Web site. And the blogsphere has blown up over it. I'm talking about GMO fields being systematically destroyed by fire in Oregon, which the FBI calls "economic sabotage" and even DOMESTIC TERRORISM. Really? So, what exactly does the FBI call the systematic destruction of honeybee colonies around the world, which is threatening the global food supply? Oh, right. It's called "Colony Collapse Disorder" because calling it "Death by Design" isn't as marketing ready. You see, bees, in Monsanto's eyes, have the potential to carry pollen from their genetically-modified crops over to neighboring crops, resulting in cross-pollination and - GASP - completely unintentional copyright infringement. Why should a world power like Monsanto care if honeybees are dying off (though, take what you read on the USDA's site with a grain of salt....it is being run by a bunch of Monsanto cronies. I use the USDA as a source because at least Monsanto is putting up some sort of front about tackling the problem)? They're probably already in the process of designing a product that can "replace" the honey bee.

 Despite their efforts the media has not been able to prevent us from catching wind of what's happening to GMO crops around the world. The people have spoken, and now the States are joining in with the chorus. The jig is up, Monsanto. Your products are killing off the world's honey bee population, and we need the honey bee. A LOT.

Polls Show: Everyone Wants GMOs to be Labeled

According to ABC News, 90 percent of Americans want to know whether or not the food they are eating has been genetically modified. While there is no conclusive data showing that GMOs are bad for human health, health is not the entirety of the issue. Full disclosure is the issue, and it's this writer's opinion that knowledge is power. Consumers should be fully informed about what they're putting into their mouths, but so far, Monsanto is winning the battle against full disclosure.

But public opinion and outcry aren't going to change just because Monsanto was, essentially, granted immunity from prosecution for any possible consequences their genetic horseplay causes. Monsanto is dead set on controlling the food supply for the entire world, it seems, even though the data doesn't back up their claims that GMOs increase productivity. According to the Rodale Institute, which conducted a 30 year study of organic and conventional farming methods, GMOs do not do what Monsanto wants us to think they do:

In a 30-year study that pits organic farming against conventional farming (including genetically modified (GM) farming starting in 2008), organic practices outperformed conventional practices leading to higher yields and higher net incomes for farmers.

The above is quoted from this article on KSL. So, that being the case, why, OH WHY, are we still having this debate? Oh, that's right, because money talks. Don't believe me? Why don't you just go ahead and find out who is heading up the FDA these days. You don't really have to, though, because I looked it up for you. His name is Michael Taylor, and he was appointed to the position by President Obama in January 2010. Guess what his employment history looks like? He was a lawyer, then a lobbyist, for (you guessed it) Monsanto. Shocked? Yeah, me neither.

As if We Needed Further Proof...

...that corporations and their money mean more to elected representatives than the health and safety of their constituents, Food Democracy Now reports that the Monsanto Protection Act has been passed by the Senate. Anthony Gucciardi from InfoWars breaks it down for us:

"Monsanto would have complete immunity from federal courts when it comes to their ability to act against any new Monsanto GMO crops that are suspected to be endangering the public or the environment (or considered to be planted illegally by the USDA). "

No, this is NOT a joke. And, sadly enough, this is not the first time that corporate interests have won out over individual interests in Congress. Basically, this act is going to make Monsanto exempt from prosecution in the very-likely case that one of their GMOs causes public and/or environmental damage. 

It's up to the President at this point to do the right thing and veto this ludicrous example of government corruption. 

UPDATE 3/28/13: Well, the President let us down, and no one is happy about it. 

If you're still confused about the whole GMO thing, check out Shad Enkilterra's GMO article in the Winter 2013 issue of Ingredients Magazine.